Since writing about the Budweiser Canada Super Bowl commercial earlier this week, I’ve been thinking a lot about when and how acknowledgments
for ideas should be given – and why this is more important than ever in today’s
world. We could talk for days, or even months, about the legalities and ethics
surrounding this topic, but there’s another aspect to this argument that many
people haven’t thought about. How does recognizing (or failing to recognize)
someone else’s contributions affect your brand’s reputation?
Lisa Tucker makes some great observations in her post
discussing the different levels of emotional connections in advertising. While she focuses on the
varying degrees of positive emotional responses, negative connections can be
formed as well – like the belief that some big brand with lots of cash is
stealing a little guy’s idea. In situations like these, there’s more to it than
just typical moral outrage. Often, people are identifying with some event or
circumstance that actually affected them.
Almost all of us have at least one experience in our lives
when we felt we weren’t given proper credit for something. Maybe your boss
presented your idea as his own at an important company meeting, or your sister
ignored your suggestion until she heard it again from someone else. Or, it
could be something as small as someone forgetting to send a thank you note for
a graduation gift. Even in cases when we recognize such a slight was accidental
or inadvertent, we generally still experience unpleasant emotions like anger,
sadness, frustration, annoyance or just plain ol’ disappointment.
So, when we hear about some instance where a person or group
hasn’t been given due credit, we naturally tend to associate that with a
similar event from our past. This drudges up all sorts of negative feelings,
which are projected onto the company perceived to be the offending party. Thus,
an emotional connection is formed – but it’s not really the one you want for
your brand.
While this scenario is nothing new, it is much more
prevalent today due to the fact that information spreads so much faster and
more freely than ever before. Ten years ago, if a couple of people thought your
idea was copycatting one from someone else, they might tell their friends,
neighbors and so forth, but the story would probably remain fairly localized.
Today, those same couple of people might make a comment on YouTube, Twitter or
Facebook – and BAM! All of a sudden, millions are talking about it and your
reputation management team has to go into overdrive to clean up the mess.
Yes, borrowing ideas and concepts may be perfectly legal and
even accepted by others in the industry, but what will the general public think
if the original creative personality isn’t acknowledged? Instead of focusing on
legal responsibilities and towing the “this is the way things work” line, we
need to give more thought to customer perception. One thing is certain: If we’re
not transparent enough about our practices, there’s always someone waiting to
step up to let us – and the rest of the world – know about it.
Photo Credit: PhotoSpin
Great post Michele! This happens so often in the games industry it's ridiculous. Any creative brainstorm type scenario will inevitably lead to someone feeling slighted that their idea was developed and appropriated by someone else. Worst case scenario their response is to decide not to volunteer any more ideas and the company loses out. I think it's cheap in company terms to be generous with credit and it circumvents all the negativity, but then people often genuinely don't remember where the credit is due.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Simon! I think that last point is where the real problems come in, especially for people who listen to ideas all day long while also generating their own. It's way too easy to forget where an idea came from, and often the final result is a meshing of several different brainstorms. But, while people are protective of their ideas, I also think they are very forgiving -- especially if the brand steps up and recognizes them after the fact when they're "reminded" about where the idea came from.
ReplyDelete